Digital Web Magazine

The web professional's online magazine of choice.

Macromedia Studio MX 2004 : Comments

By Jesse Nieminen

April 14, 2004

Comments

Leo

September 25, 2004 3:34 PM

I read the article and wonder how much money the author received from Macromedia to publish it? Maybe some free perks, if not money. ;-)
The only point I agree with is that Flash became better/faster, all the other apps run either slower, crash more often or useful features have been removed (they also added new ones, but I don’t really need them). If you don’t believe me, browse to amazon.com and do a search on Studio MX 2004 products and read the reviews from people complaining about how slow the new versions run and much more.

Regards,
Leo from Toronto, Canada

Leo

September 25, 2004 3:35 PM

I read the article and wonder how much money the author received from Macromedia to publish it? Maybe some free perks, if not money. ;-)
The only point I agree with is that Flash became better/faster, all the other apps run either slower, crash more often or useful features have been removed (they also added new ones, but I don’t really need them). If you don’t believe me, browse to amazon.com and do a search on Studio MX 2004 products and read the reviews from people complaining about how slow the new versions run and much more.

Regards,
Leo from Toronto, Canada

Sorry, comments are closed.

Media Temple

via Ad Packs